The problems we get hired to fix
Every studio claims to do everything. In practice, six problems account for most of what lands in our inbox, and we have a playbook for each one. Here is the problem, our approach, and what you walk away with, section by section.
- Free 30-minute scope call
- Quote within 48 hours
- You own all the code
AI document intake
- The problem
- Teams spend hours a week re-keying PDFs, invoices, and contracts into the systems that actually run the business. It is tedious, error-prone, and not the work anyone was hired to do.
- Our approach
- We build LLM extraction pipelines that read the document, pull out the fields that matter, and flag anything they are not confident about for a human to check in a review UI. Every pipeline ships with an evaluation suite run against your real documents before it reaches a live one.
- What you get
- A document that used to take minutes to key in by hand now takes seconds, with a review queue for the exceptions instead of a spreadsheet full of typos.
Customer portals
- The problem
- Clients email you spreadsheets, PDFs, and one-off status requests because there is nowhere for them to check things themselves. Every one of those emails is a support ticket that did not need to exist.
- Our approach
- We build a portal with proper roles and permissions on top of the systems you already run, with an API underneath so it can grow past a single screen. Weekly demos mean your team is clicking through real screens from week one, not waiting for a big reveal.
- What you get
- Fewer support tickets, clients who can self-serve the status they used to email about, and a portal built to be extended rather than replaced.
Legacy .NET modernization
- The problem
- A decade-old .NET monolith is running the business and nobody wants to be the one who breaks it. Deploys are rare, nerve-wracking events, and the people who understood the original design have mostly moved on.
- Our approach
- We start with a short paid audit that maps the system as it actually is, not as the documentation remembers it. Then we carve it into maintainable .NET Core services one seam at a time, with the old system running until the new one has earned trust. No big-bang rewrites.
- What you get
- Deploys become routine instead of an event, and the business keeps running the entire time we are working on it.
Internal tools & dashboards
- The problem
- Operations is running on spreadsheets, shared documents, and whatever the one person who remembers the process happens to know. It works until that person is on vacation.
- Our approach
- We build a focused tool around how your team actually works, not a generic admin panel nobody asked for. It ships in weekly increments, so the people who will use it are testing it long before launch.
- What you get
- One source of truth that replaces the spreadsheet, and a tool your team adopts because it was built around their workflow, not a vendor's guess at it.
Startup MVPs
- The problem
- You have funding, a deadline, and no engineering bench of your own yet. Every week without a product is a week of runway spent on nothing customers can see.
- Our approach
- We fix the scope, quote it in writing within 48 hours, and demo working software every Friday so you always know exactly what has shipped. You own the code from day one, which matters the moment you hire your own engineers.
- What you get
- A launched product in weeks, not quarters, with documentation and a clean handover so your first engineering hires can pick it up without archaeology.
Workflow automation
- The problem
- A process runs across four different tools, stitched together by someone copying data between them by hand every day. It works, until that person is out sick or the volume doubles.
- Our approach
- We automate the boring, repeatable path and keep a human in the loop for the exceptions that need judgment. We will say it plainly: sometimes a cron job beats a chatbot, and we would rather build you the cron job than sell you the fancier thing.
- What you get
- The hours that used to go into manual busywork come back as capacity, without adding headcount to keep the process running.
See your problem up there?
That's the whole point of the scope call: thirty minutes, free, and a straight answer either way.